↓ Skip to main content

Why nestedness in mutualistic networks?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Theoretical Biology, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
265 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why nestedness in mutualistic networks?
Published in
Journal of Theoretical Biology, August 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enrique Burgos, Horacio Ceva, Roberto P.J. Perazzo, Mariano Devoto, Diego Medan, Martín Zimmermann, Ana María Delbue

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 17 4%
Spain 7 2%
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 350 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 26%
Student > Master 61 15%
Researcher 53 13%
Student > Bachelor 36 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 8%
Other 69 17%
Unknown 44 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 233 58%
Environmental Science 58 14%
Physics and Astronomy 12 3%
Mathematics 6 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 1%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 61 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,369,297
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#550
of 4,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,461
of 76,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.