| Title |
Clarifying empathy: the first step to more humane clinical care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp16x683761 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Jeffrey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 27 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,895,074
of 23,952,301 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,857
of 4,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,934
of 403,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#42
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,952,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.