↓ Skip to main content

Examining the Nuance in Public Opinion of Pro-LGB Policies in a “Red State”

Overview of attention for article published in Sexuality Research and Social Policy, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Examining the Nuance in Public Opinion of Pro-LGB Policies in a “Red State”
Published in
Sexuality Research and Social Policy, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13178-015-0213-x
Authors

Mathew Stange, Emily Kazyak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,147,944
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#58
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,234
of 394,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them