↓ Skip to main content

CHD3 helicase domain mutations cause a neurodevelopmental syndrome with macrocephaly and impaired speech and language

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CHD3 helicase domain mutations cause a neurodevelopmental syndrome with macrocephaly and impaired speech and language
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-06014-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lot Snijders Blok, Justine Rousseau, Joanna Twist, Sophie Ehresmann, Motoki Takaku, Hanka Venselaar, Lance H. Rodan, Catherine B. Nowak, Jessica Douglas, Kathryn J. Swoboda, Marcie A. Steeves, Inderneel Sahai, Connie T. R. M. Stumpel, Alexander P. A. Stegmann, Patricia Wheeler, Marcia Willing, Elise Fiala, Aaina Kochhar, William T. Gibson, Ana S. A. Cohen, Ruky Agbahovbe, A. Micheil Innes, P. Y. Billie Au, Julia Rankin, Ilse J. Anderson, Steven A. Skinner, Raymond J. Louie, Hannah E. Warren, Alexandra Afenjar, Boris Keren, Caroline Nava, Julien Buratti, Arnaud Isapof, Diana Rodriguez, Raymond Lewandowski, Jennifer Propst, Ton van Essen, Murim Choi, Sangmoon Lee, Jong H. Chae, Susan Price, Rhonda E. Schnur, Ganka Douglas, Ingrid M. Wentzensen, Christiane Zweier, André Reis, Martin G. Bialer, Christine Moore, Marije Koopmans, Eva H. Brilstra, Glen R. Monroe, Koen L. I. van Gassen, Ellen van Binsbergen, Ruth Newbury-Ecob, Lucy Bownass, Ingrid Bader, Johannes A. Mayr, Saskia B. Wortmann, Kathy J. Jakielski, Edythe A. Strand, Katja Kloth, Tatjana Bierhals, John D. Roberts, Robert M. Petrovich, Shinichi Machida, Hitoshi Kurumizaka, Stefan Lelieveld, Rolph Pfundt, Sandra Jansen, Pelagia Deriziotis, Laurence Faivre, Julien Thevenon, Mirna Assoum, Lawrence Shriberg, Tjitske Kleefstra, Han G. Brunner, Paul A. Wade, Simon E. Fisher, Philippe M. Campeau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 50 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Linguistics 4 3%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 53 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,847,683
of 25,393,455 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#24,781
of 56,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,308
of 359,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#665
of 1,479 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,479 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.