| Title |
The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-016-1849-x |
| Authors |
Dorte Henriksen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Denmark | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Professor | 12 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 27% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 41 | 35% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,436,551
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#865
of 2,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,796
of 396,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#16
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.