| Title |
Gestational weight gain charts for different body mass index groups for women in Europe, North America, and Oceania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-018-1189-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susana Santos, Iris Eekhout, Ellis Voerman, Romy Gaillard, Henrique Barros, Marie-Aline Charles, Leda Chatzi, Cécile Chevrier, George P. Chrousos, Eva Corpeleijn, Nathalie Costet, Sarah Crozier, Myriam Doyon, Merete Eggesbø, Maria Pia Fantini, Sara Farchi, Francesco Forastiere, Luigi Gagliardi, Vagelis Georgiu, Keith M. Godfrey, Davide Gori, Veit Grote, Wojciech Hanke, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Barbara Heude, Marie-France Hivert, Daniel Hryhorczuk, Rae-Chi Huang, Hazel Inskip, Todd A. Jusko, Anne M. Karvonen, Berthold Koletzko, Leanne K. Küpers, Hanna Lagström, Debbie A. Lawlor, Irina Lehmann, Maria-Jose Lopez-Espinosa, Per Magnus, Renata Majewska, Johanna Mäkelä, Yannis Manios, Sheila W. McDonald, Monique Mommers, Camilla S. Morgen, George Moschonis, Ľubica Murínová, John Newnham, Ellen A. Nohr, Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen, Emily Oken, Adriëtte J. J. M. Oostvogels, Agnieszka Pac, Eleni Papadopoulou, Juha Pekkanen, Costanza Pizzi, Kinga Polanska, Daniela Porta, Lorenzo Richiardi, Sheryl L. Rifas-Shiman, Nel Roeleveld, Loreto Santa-Marina, Ana C. Santos, Henriette A. Smit, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Marie Standl, Maggie Stanislawski, Camilla Stoltenberg, Elisabeth Thiering, Carel Thijs, Maties Torrent, Suzanne C. Tough, Tomas Trnovec, Marleen M. H. J. van Gelder, Lenie van Rossem, Andrea von Berg, Martine Vrijheid, Tanja G. M. Vrijkotte, Oleksandr Zvinchuk, Stef van Buuren, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 4 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 36% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 196 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 78 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 90 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,388,872
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,610
of 4,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,279
of 369,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#34
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.