| Title |
Ovarian reserve and in vitro fertilization cycles outcome according to women smoking status and stimulation regimen
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00404-011-2172-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Freour, Damien Masson, Lionel Dessolle, Dalila Allaoua, Thomas Dejoie, Sophie Mirallie, Miguel Jean, Paul Barriere |
| Abstract |
Smoking is known to be deleterious on female fertility and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome, probably partly through ovarian reserve alteration. Recently, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) have been shown to be the most accurate ovarian reserve markers. Here, we compared ovarian reserve markers in women undergoing IVF according to smoking status and stimulation regimen. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2011.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#1,196
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,998
of 248,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.