↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Chronic Kidney Disease Japan Cohort study: baseline characteristics and factors associated with causative diseases and renal function

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Chronic Kidney Disease Japan Cohort study: baseline characteristics and factors associated with causative diseases and renal function
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10157-010-0352-6
Authors

Enyu Imai, Seiichi Matsuo, Hirofumi Makino, Tsuyoshi Watanabe, Tadao Akizawa, Kosaku Nitta, Satoshi Iimuro, Yasuo Ohashi, Akira Hishida

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2018.
All research outputs
#19,244,099
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#506
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,993
of 101,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.