You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Small Cell Lung Cancer: Can Recent Advances in Biology and Molecular Biology Be Translated into Improved Outcomes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.01.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul A. Bunn, John D. Minna, Alexander Augustyn, Adi F. Gazdar, Youcef Ouadah, Mark A. Krasnow, Anton Berns, Elisabeth Brambilla, Natasha Rekhtman, Pierre P. Massion, Matthew Niederst, Martin Peifer, Jun Yokota, Ramaswamy Govindan, John T. Poirier, Lauren A. Byers, Murry W. Wynes, David G. McFadden, David MacPherson, Christine L. Hann, Anna F. Farago, Caroline Dive, Beverly A. Teicher, Craig D. Peacock, Jane E. Johnson, Melanie H. Cobb, Hans-Guido Wendel, David Spigel, Julien Sage, Ping Yang, M. Catherine Pietanza, Lee M. Krug, John Heymach, Peter Ujhazy, Caicun Zhou, Koichi Goto, Afshin Dowlati, Camilla Laulund Christensen, Keunchil Park, Lawrence H. Einhorn, Martin J. Edelman, Giuseppe Giaccone, David E. Gerber, Ravi Salgia, Taofeek Owonikoko, Shakun Malik, Niki Karachaliou, David R. Gandara, Ben J. Slotman, Fiona Blackhall, Glenwood Goss, Roman Thomas, Charles M. Rudin, Fred R. Hirsch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 63 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 70 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,932,966
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#825
of 3,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,089
of 408,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#20
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.