↓ Skip to main content

Identification and Management of Chronic Pain in Primary Care: a Review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
Title
Identification and Management of Chronic Pain in Primary Care: a Review
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11920-015-0659-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Mills, Nicola Torrance, Blair H. Smith

Abstract

Chronic pain is a common, complex, and challenging condition, where understanding the biological, social, physical and psychological contexts is vital to successful outcomes in primary care. In managing chronic pain the focus is often on promoting rehabilitation and maximizing quality of life rather than achieving cure. Recent screening tools and brief intervention techniques can be effective in helping clinicians identify, stratify and manage both patients already living with chronic pain and those who are at risk of developing chronic pain from acute pain. Frequent assessment and re-assessment are key to ensuring treatment is appropriate and safe, as well as minimizing and addressing side effects. Primary care management should be holistic and evidence-based (where possible) and incorporates both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, including psychology, self-management, physiotherapy, peripheral nervous system stimulation, complementary therapies and comprehensive pain-management programmes. These may either be based wholly in primary care or supported by appropriate specialist referral.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 398 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 15%
Student > Bachelor 53 13%
Researcher 33 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 6%
Other 66 16%
Unknown 130 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 16%
Psychology 35 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Neuroscience 11 3%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 133 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#946,350
of 25,355,907 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#118
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,980
of 409,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,355,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.