↓ Skip to main content

Falling after epidural analgesia: lessons from obstetric anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
Title
Falling after epidural analgesia: lessons from obstetric anesthesia
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12630-016-0603-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Loubert, Roshan Fernando

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2,090
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,196
of 406,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#22
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.