↓ Skip to main content

Geographic population structure and subspecific boundaries in a tidal marsh sparrow

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Geographic population structure and subspecific boundaries in a tidal marsh sparrow
Published in
Conservation Genetics, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10592-016-0809-6
Authors

Russell Greenberg, Kristina M. Cammen, Amy G. Wilson, Brian J. Olsen, Barbara Ballentine, Nancy C. McInerney, Robert C. Fleischer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Librarian 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 50%
Environmental Science 4 17%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,182,977
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#119
of 1,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,397
of 393,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.