↓ Skip to main content

Association of Forced Vital Capacity with the Developmental Gene NCOR2

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of Forced Vital Capacity with the Developmental Gene NCOR2
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2016
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0147388
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cosetta Minelli, Charlotte H. Dean, Matthew Hind, Alexessander Couto Alves, André F. S. Amaral, Valerie Siroux, Ville Huikari, María Soler Artigas, David M. Evans, Daan W. Loth, Yohan Bossé, Dirkje S. Postma, Don Sin, John Thompson, Florence Demenais, John Henderson, Emmanuelle Bouzigon, Deborah Jarvis, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Peter Burney

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Sweden 1 1%
Iceland 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 24%
Professor 10 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 18 25%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Computer Science 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,059,753
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#109,230
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,076
of 411,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,990
of 5,229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.