↓ Skip to main content

Exposure to loud noise and risk of vestibular schwannoma: results from the INTERPHONE international case‒control study.

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exposure to loud noise and risk of vestibular schwannoma: results from the INTERPHONE international case‒control study.
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, November 2018
DOI 10.5271/sjweh.3781
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle Deltour, Brigitte Schlehofer, Amélie Massardier-Pilonchéry, Klaus Schlaefer, Bruce Armstrong, Graham G Giles, Jack Siemiatycki, Marie-Elise Parent, Daniel Krewski, Mary McBride, Christoffer Johansen, Anssi Auvinen, Tiina Salminen, Martine Hours, Lucile Montestrucq, Maria Blettner, Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff, Siegal Sadetzki, Angela Chetrit, Susanna Lagorio, Ivano Iavarone, Naohito Yamaguchi, Toru Takebayashi, Alistair Woodward, Angus Cook, Tore Tynes, Lars Klaeboe, Maria Feychting, Stefan Lönn, Sarah Fleming, Anthony J Swerdlow, Minouk J Schoemaker, Monika Moissonnier, Ausrele Kesminiene, Elisabeth Cardis, Joachim Schüz

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 24%
Social Sciences 4 14%
Engineering 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2018.
All research outputs
#24,291,573
of 34,640,154 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
#2,059
of 2,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,340
of 397,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,640,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.