↓ Skip to main content

Surgical outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma with biliary tumor thrombus: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Surgical outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma with biliary tumor thrombus: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12876-016-0427-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenhui Qiao, Feng Yu, Lupeng Wu, Bin Li, Yanming Zhou

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with biliary tumor thrombus (BTT) is rare and its impact on postoperative prognosis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the published evidence concerning the outcome of surgical resection of HCC with BTT. Eligible studies were identified by searching PubMed and reviewed systematically. Comparisons of the clinicopathologic features and surgical outcomes for HCC patients with or without BTT were analyzed using meta-analytical techniques. Twenty retrospective studies containing 598 patients that met the selection criteria were included for review. The perioperative mortality was 2.1 % (range, 0-10 %), and the median 5-year overall survival (OS) was 24 % (range, 0-48 %) with a recurrence rate of 63.9 % (range, 42-91 %). Pooled analysis of 13 comparative studies showed that HCC patients with BTT had a higher incidence of vascular invasion (odds ratio [OR]: 4.70, 95 % CI: 2.90-7.60; P <0.001), a higher frequency of poor differentiation (OR: 2.07, 95 % CI: 1.23-3.49; P = 0.006), and a shorter 5-year OS rate (OR: 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.21-0.64; P <0.001) than those without BTT. Although HCC with BTT has more aggressive biological characteristics and is an indicator of poor prognosis, surgical resection can still provide long-term survival for some patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Student > Postgraduate 3 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 67%
Psychology 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,303,950
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#1,364
of 1,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,477
of 396,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.