You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrating plant‐ and animal‐based perspectives for more effective restoration of biodiversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/16-0108.1 |
| Authors |
Clive McAlpine, Carla P Catterall, Ralph Mac Nally, David Lindenmayer, J Leighton Reid, Karen D Holl, Andrew F Bennett, Rebecca K Runting, Kerrie Wilson, Richard J Hobbs, Leonie Seabrook, Shaun Cunningham, Atte Moilanen, Martine Maron, Luke Shoo, Ian Lunt, Peter Vesk, Libby Rumpff, Tara G Martin, James Thomson, Hugh Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 11 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 64% |
| Scientists | 11 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| New Caledonia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 325 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 74 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 15% |
| Unknown | 59 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 125 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 118 | 35% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 76 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,367,775
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#464
of 1,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,901
of 411,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.