| Title |
Social factors mediating human–carnivore coexistence: Understanding thematic strands influencing coexistence in Central Romania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-015-0760-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ine Dorresteijn, Andra Ioana Milcu, Julia Leventon, Jan Hanspach, Joern Fischer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 18% |
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 65 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 49 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,874,369
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#673
of 1,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,679
of 403,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.