| Title |
We Can Make It Better: “We” Moderates the Relationship Between a Compromising Style in Interpersonal Conflict and Well-Being
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Happiness Studies, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10902-014-9582-8 |
| Authors |
Wei-Fang Lin, Yi-Cheng Lin, Chin-Lan Huang, Lung Hung Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 34% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,165,932
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Happiness Studies
#152
of 946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,050
of 254,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Happiness Studies
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.