You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Marine natural products
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Product Reports, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c5np00156k |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John W. Blunt, Brent R. Copp, Robert A. Keyzers, Murray H. G. Munro, Michèle R. Prinsep |
| Abstract |
Covering: 2014. Previous review: Nat. Prod. Rep., 2015, 32, 116-211This review covers the literature published in 2014 for marine natural products (MNPs), with 1116 citations (753 for the period January to December 2014) referring to compounds isolated from marine microorganisms and phytoplankton, green, brown and red algae, sponges, cnidarians, bryozoans, molluscs, tunicates, echinoderms, mangroves and other intertidal plants and microorganisms. The emphasis is on new compounds (1378 in 456 papers for 2014), together with the relevant biological activities, source organisms and country of origin. Reviews, biosynthetic studies, first syntheses, and syntheses that lead to the revision of structures or stereochemistries, have been included. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 375 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 15% |
| Researcher | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 14% |
| Unknown | 99 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 104 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Unknown | 111 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,563,220
of 24,359,979 outputs
Outputs from Natural Product Reports
#291
of 1,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,764
of 402,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Product Reports
#11
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,359,979 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.