| Title |
Electrical Vagal Nerve Stimulation Ameliorates Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling and Improves Survival in Rats With Severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Basic to Translational Science, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.07.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keimei Yoshida, Keita Saku, Kazuhiro Kamada, Kohtaro Abe, Mariko Tanaka-Ishikawa, Takeshi Tohyama, Takuya Nishikawa, Takuya Kishi, Kenji Sunagawa, Hiroyuki Tsutsui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Russia | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 17% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,390,097
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#293
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,306
of 356,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.