You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Skin Patterns Associated with Upper Airway Infantile Haemangiomas: A Retrospective Multicentre Study.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Dermato-Venereologica, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2340/00015555-2357 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Uthurriague, Olivia Boccara, Benoît Catteau, Pierre Fayoux, Christine Léauté-Labrèze, Christine Chiaverini, Annabel Maruani, Soizick Pondaven-Letourmy, Abdulqader Alaidarous, Eve Puzenat, Thomas Hubiche, Stéphanie Mallet, Isabelle Dreyfus, Juliette Mazereeuw-Hautier |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to define the skin patterns at high risk for upper airway infantile haemangioma. A retrospective multicentre French observational study was conducted between January 2006 and 2015 and all confirmed airway haemangioma were included. Thirty-eight patients with airway haemangioma from 9 centres were included. 31 patients had a cutaneous or mucosal haemangioma: 21 with a location considered at high risk for airway haemangioma (large segmental mandibular haemangioma), 4 with a very mild facial involvement (lower lip or S1 (frontotemporal segment according to Haggstrom and Frieden)) and 6 with either lesions of the neck or body or association of both. We report here the largest cohort of airway haemangioma. A third of patients do not completely fit with the definition of the high-risk area of airway haemangioma. Segmental lower lip and neck involvement also seem to be very suggestive areas. Clinicians must be able to recognize these areas. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 53% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#17,490,079
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Acta Dermato-Venereologica
#1,311
of 2,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,176
of 401,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Dermato-Venereologica
#44
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.