You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Intersex (Testicular Oocytes) in Smallmouth Bass from the Potomac River and Selected Nearby Drainages
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1577/h07-031.1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
V. S. Blazer, L. R. Iwanowicz, D. D. Iwanowicz, D. R. Smith, J. A. Young, J. D. Hedrick, S. W. Foster, S. J. Reeser |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 5% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 96 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 26 | 25% |
Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 35% |
Environmental Science | 28 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
Engineering | 5 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,387,070
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Aquatic Animal Health
#6
of 277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,000
of 184,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Aquatic Animal Health
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 277 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.