↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of a course of realistic surgical training during medical education as a tool for pre-residential surgical training

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of a course of realistic surgical training during medical education as a tool for pre-residential surgical training
Published in
BMC Medical Education, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12909-016-0568-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominik S. Schoeb, Eva Brennecke, Anne Andert, Jochen Grommes, Klaus T. von Trotha, Andreas Prescher, Ulf P. Neumann, Marcel Binnebösel

Abstract

In recent years the focus on practical skills in the German curriculum of medical school has increased greatly. In this study we evaluate the value of a practical surgery course for medical students as a tool for surgical education, as a way of enhancing interest in surgical fields, and as a method of influencing medical students to subsequently choose a surgical career. The "Feel like a surgeon"-course is an optional practical surgery course in which topographical anatomy and realistic surgical training using fresh human cadavers are combined for medical students of the RWTH Aachen University. Between 2010 and 2015 every student completed a survey before starting and after completing our course, and in 2015 a follow-up was performed. Using a standardized questionnaire, course quality, learning success and impact on post-instructional career and choice of profession was evaluated. In total, 82 students attended our course between 2010 and 2015 and took part in the evaluation. Evaluation of the course was positive overall, with an average grade of 1.4° ± °0.50. Significant improvement of basic, as well as more complex surgical skills and theoretical knowledge was noted. Furthermore, self-confidence for patient related assignments improved as well. In the follow-up evaluation, a high level of recommendation for surgical residents was seen, as was a high influence of the course on our students' career choice, although no significant change in career plans before and after taking the course was noted. Our results indicate that a practical surgical course can be a valuable tool to prepare students for a surgical residency and to improve their practical skills generally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Librarian 4 5%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 41%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,820,431
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,838
of 3,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,149
of 399,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#71
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.