↓ Skip to main content

Gnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Gnosis
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10992-010-9156-0
Authors

Marcus Kracht

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 25%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 14 23%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Computer Science 5 8%
Psychology 4 7%
Philosophy 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2012.
All research outputs
#12,943,390
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#114
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,430
of 99,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.