| Title |
Crying wolf, crying foul, or crying shame: alien salmonids and a biodiversity crisis in the southern cool-temperate galaxioid fishes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-006-9017-7 |
| Authors |
R. M. McDowall |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 218 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 122 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 61 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,358,936
of 25,130,202 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#272
of 632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,786
of 170,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,130,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them