Title |
Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Spine Journal, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00586-009-1191-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
ShunWu Fan, ZhiJun Hu, FengDong Zhao, Xing Zhao, Yue Huang, Xiangqian Fang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 154 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
Other | 37 | 23% |
Unknown | 46 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
Engineering | 7 | 4% |
Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 9% |
Unknown | 47 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,182,761
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#442
of 4,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,601
of 94,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,640 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.