↓ Skip to main content

Atrophy of the nuchal muscle and change in cervical curvature after expansive open-door laminoplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, April 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Atrophy of the nuchal muscle and change in cervical curvature after expansive open-door laminoplasty
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, April 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00434554
Pubmed ID
Authors

Y. Fujimura, Y. Nishi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 63%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,414,969
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#104
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,361
of 28,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them