| Title |
The theory of a cline
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Genetics, January 1948
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02986626 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. B. S. Haldane |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 6% |
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 28% |
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,709,953
of 23,566,295 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetics
#30
of 685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93
of 4,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,566,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 685 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them