| Title |
2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.044 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fred M. Kusumoto, Mark H. Schoenfeld, Coletta Barrett, James R. Edgerton, Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, Michael R. Gold, Nora F. Goldschlager, Robert M. Hamilton, José A. Joglar, Robert J. Kim, Richard Lee, Joseph E. Marine, Christopher J. McLeod, Keith R. Oken, Kristen K. Patton, Cara N. Pellegrini, Kimberly A. Selzman, Annemarie Thompson, Paul D. Varosy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 171 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 20% |
| Spain | 25 | 15% |
| Mexico | 9 | 5% |
| Colombia | 5 | 3% |
| Turkey | 3 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 116 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 16% |
| Scientists | 18 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 497 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 497 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 52 | 10% |
| Other | 45 | 9% |
| Researcher | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 12% |
| Unknown | 207 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 187 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 6% |
| Unknown | 224 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 293. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#121,408
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#274
of 16,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,363
of 366,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#7
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.