↓ Skip to main content

Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles
Published in
Scientometrics, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11192-016-1869-6
Authors

Olgica Nedić, Aleksandar Dekanski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Librarian 5 18%
Other 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Professor 3 11%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Social Sciences 6 21%
Computer Science 5 18%
Chemistry 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,227,170
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,273
of 2,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,327
of 397,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#29
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.