You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biomaterial‐Enhanced Cell and Drug Delivery: Lessons Learned in the Cardiac Field and Future Perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advanced Materials, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/adma.201505349 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hugh S O'Neill, Laura B Gallagher, Janice O'Sullivan, William Whyte, Clive Curley, Eimear Dolan, Aamir Hameed, Joanne O'Dwyer, Christina Payne, Daniel O'Reilly, Eduardo Ruiz-Hernandez, Ellen T Roche, Fergal J O'Brien, Sally Ann Cryan, Helena Kelly, Bruce Murphy, Garry P Duffy |
| Abstract |
Heart failure is a significant clinical issue. It is the cause of enormous healthcare costs worldwide and results in significant morbidity and mortality. Cardiac regenerative therapy has progressed considerably from clinical and preclinical studies delivering simple suspensions of cells, macromolecule, and small molecules to more advanced delivery methods utilizing biomaterial scaffolds as depots for localized targeted delivery to the damaged and ischemic myocardium. Here, regenerative strategies for cardiac tissue engineering with a focus on advanced delivery strategies and the use of multimodal therapeutic strategies are reviewed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 7 | 58% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Portugal | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 24% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 24 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 12 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,104,859
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#2,721
of 16,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,767
of 406,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#44
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.