| Title |
Endonasal Endoscopic Surgery in the Management of Sinonasal and Anterior Skull Base Malignancies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Head and Neck Pathology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12105-016-0687-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher R. Roxbury, Masaru Ishii, Jeremy D. Richmon, Ari M. Blitz, Douglas D. Reh, Gary L. Gallia |
| Abstract |
Sinonasal malignancies represent a rare subset of tumors with a wide variety of histopathologic diagnoses and overall poor prognosis. These tumors tend to have an insidious onset with non-specific symptoms which often leads to delayed diagnosis and advanced local disease at presentation. The principal goal of surgery is to obtain a negative margin resection. Open craniofacial techniques are well established in the management of sinonasal malignancies and remain the treatment of choice for many advanced tumors. Over the past couple of decades, there has been tremendous application of endoscopic techniques to skull base pathologies including sinonasal malignancies. For selected cases, endonasal endoscopic techniques can be performed with curative intent and reduced surgical morbidity and mortality. Here we discuss principles of surgical management of sinonasal malignancies, review the techniques of endonasal endoscopic resection of sinonasal malignancies, and highlight the importance of pathology in the multi-disciplinary management of patients with these complex lesions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 47% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#14,246,461
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Head and Neck Pathology
#730
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,444
of 397,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head and Neck Pathology
#27
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.