| Title |
Barriers to a software reminder system for risk assessment of stroke in atrial fibrillation: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised trial in general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp18x699809 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim A Holt, Andrew Rh Dalton, Susan Kirkpatrick, Jenny Hislop, Tom Marshall, Matthew Fay, Nadeem Qureshi, Daniel S Lasserson, Karen Kearley, Jill Mollison, Ly-Mee Yu, David Fitzmaurice, Fd Richard Hobbs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,996,250
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#975
of 4,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,165
of 352,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#27
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.