↓ Skip to main content

Germline polymorphisms in an enhancer of PSIP1 are associated with progression-free survival in epithelial ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Oncotarget, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Germline polymorphisms in an enhancer of PSIP1 are associated with progression-free survival in epithelial ovarian cancer
Published in
Oncotarget, January 2016
DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.7047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliet D. French, Sharon E. Johnatty, Yi Lu, Jonathan Beesley, Bo Gao, Murugan Kalimutho, Michelle J. Henderson, Amanda J. Russell, Siddhartha Kar, Xiaoqing Chen, Kristine M. Hillman, Susanne Kaufmann, Haran Sivakumaran, Martin O’Reilly, Chen Wang, Darren J. Korbie, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Australian Cancer Study, Diether Lambrechts, Evelyn Despierre, Els Van Nieuwenhuysen, Sandrina Lambrechts, Ignace Vergote, Beth Karlan, Jenny Lester, Sandra Orsulic, Christine Walsh, Peter A. Fasching, Matthias W. Beckmann, Arif B. Ekici, Alexander Hein, Keitaro Matsuo, Satoyo Hosono, Jacobus Pisterer, Peter Hillemanns, Toru Nakanishi, Yasushi Yatabe, Marc T. Goodman, Galina Lurie, Rayna K. Matsuno, Pamela J. Thompson, Tanja Pejovic, Yukie Bean, Florian Heitz, Philipp Harter, Andreas du Bois, Ira Schwaab, Estrid Hogdall, Susanne K. Kjaer, Allan Jensen, Claus Hogdall, Lene Lundvall, Svend Aage Engelholm, Bob Brown, James M. Flanagan, Michelle D. Metcalf, Nadeem Siddiqui, Thomas Sellers, Brooke Fridley, Julie Cunningham, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Ed Iversen, Rachel Palmieri Weber, Donal Brennan, Andrew Berchuck, Paul Pharoah, Paul Harnett, Murray D. Norris, Michelle Haber, Ellen L. Goode, Jason S. Lee, Kum Kum Khanna, Kerstin B. Meyer, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Anna deFazio, Stacey L. Edwards, Stuart MacGregor, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Abstract

Women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are usually treated with platinum/taxane therapy after cytoreductive surgery but there is considerable inter-individual variation in response. To identify germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that contribute to variations in individual responses to chemotherapy, we carried out a multi-phase genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 1,244 women diagnosed with serous EOC who were treated with the same first-line chemotherapy, carboplatin and paclitaxel. We identified two SNPs (rs7874043 and rs72700653) in TTC39B (best P=7x10-5, HR=1.90, for rs7874043) associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Functional analyses show that both SNPs lie in a putative regulatory element (PRE) that physically interacts with the promoters of PSIP1, CCDC171 and an alternative promoter of TTC39B. The C allele of rs7874043 is associated with poor PFS and showed increased binding of the Sp1 transcription factor, which is critical for chromatin interactions with PSIP1. Silencing of PSIP1 significantly impaired DNA damage-induced Rad51 nuclear foci and reduced cell viability in ovarian cancer lines. PSIP1 (PC4 and SFRS1 Interacting Protein 1) is known to protect cells from stress-induced apoptosis, and high expression is associated with poor PFS in EOC patients. We therefore suggest that the minor allele of rs7874043 confers poor PFS by increasing PSIP1 expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Psychology 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,778,035
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Oncotarget
#1,112
of 14,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,182
of 397,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncotarget
#46
of 974 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 974 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.