| Title |
Tunable 3D Nanofiber Architecture of Polycaprolactone by Divergence Electrospinning for Potential Tissue Engineering Applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nano-Micro Letters, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40820-018-0226-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
George Z. Tan, Yingge Zhou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 14 | 25% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,681,279
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Nano-Micro Letters
#70
of 983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,062
of 350,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano-Micro Letters
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 983 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them