You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Talking about contract cheating: facilitating a forum for collaborative development of assessment practices to combat student dishonesty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Academic Development, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1080/1360144x.2018.1521813 |
| Authors |
Christine Slade, Susan Rowland, Dominic McGrath |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 26% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,559,562
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Academic Development
#79
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,097
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Academic Development
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.