↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Natural and Nano-synthetically-Produced Hydroxyapatite Powder

Overview of attention for article published in JOM, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of Natural and Nano-synthetically-Produced Hydroxyapatite Powder
Published in
JOM, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11837-018-3185-5
Authors

Ali Sabea Hammood, Sora Saleem Hassan, Mohammed Talib Alkhafagy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 17%
Materials Science 3 13%
Chemistry 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,682,250
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#1,129
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,359
of 350,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.