| Title |
A graphical article-level metric for intuitive comparison of large-scale literatures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-015-1782-4 |
| Authors |
Xiaoxi Ling, Yu Liu, Zhen Huang, Parantu K. Shah, Cheng Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 9 | 22% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 27% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 10 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 17% |
| Engineering | 4 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 27% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,834,028
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,937
of 2,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,718
of 285,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#20
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.