| Title |
Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a survey study with mean follow-up of 12 years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10151-018-1860-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Sturiale, B. Fabiani, C. Menconi, D. Cafaro, F. Fusco, G. Bellio, M. Schiano di Visconte, G. Naldini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 13% |
| Spain | 12 | 10% |
| United States | 8 | 7% |
| Mexico | 7 | 6% |
| Turkey | 6 | 5% |
| Italy | 4 | 3% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 47 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 33 | 28% |
| Scientists | 14 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 66% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 66% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#605,248
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#14
of 1,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,107
of 355,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.