↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Completeness of a Radiology Glossary Using Iterative Refinement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Digital Imaging, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating Completeness of a Radiology Glossary Using Iterative Refinement
Published in
Journal of Digital Imaging, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10278-018-0137-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Y. W. Chan, Charles E. Kahn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Psychology 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#13,629,725
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#620
of 1,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,909
of 346,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,067 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.