You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Overcoming EGFRG724S-mediated osimertinib resistance through unique binding characteristics of second-generation EGFR inhibitors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-07078-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jana Fassunke, Fabienne Müller, Marina Keul, Sebastian Michels, Marcel A. Dammert, Anna Schmitt, Dennis Plenker, Jonas Lategahn, Carina Heydt, Johannes Brägelmann, Hannah L. Tumbrink, Yannic Alber, Sebastian Klein, Alena Heimsoeth, Ilona Dahmen, Rieke N. Fischer, Matthias Scheffler, Michaela A. Ihle, Vanessa Priesner, Andreas H. Scheel, Svenja Wagener, Anna Kron, Konrad Frank, Katia Garbert, Thorsten Persigehl, Michael Püsken, Stefan Haneder, Bernhard Schaaf, Ernst Rodermann, Walburga Engel-Riedel, Enriqueta Felip, Egbert F. Smit, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, H. Christian Reinhardt, Stefan M. Kast, Jürgen Wolf, Daniel Rauh, Reinhard Büttner, Martin L. Sos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 25% |
| Scientists | 11 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 22% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#973,491
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#15,926
of 57,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,062
of 366,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#443
of 1,497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.