↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous immunoglobulins versus plasma exchange in the treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous immunoglobulins versus plasma exchange in the treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome
Published in
Critical Care, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc7272
Authors

B Charra, A Hachimi, A Benslama, S Motaouakkil

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 43%
Professor 1 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2017.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#6,383
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,818
of 109,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#37
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.