Title |
Social isolation, loneliness and depression in young adulthood: a behavioural genetic analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00127-016-1178-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Timothy Matthews, Andrea Danese, Jasmin Wertz, Candice L. Odgers, Antony Ambler, Terrie E. Moffitt, Louise Arseneault |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 18 | 33% |
United States | 4 | 7% |
Brazil | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 24 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 56% |
Scientists | 15 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 814 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 809 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 162 | 20% |
Student > Master | 100 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 10% |
Researcher | 51 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 6% |
Other | 105 | 13% |
Unknown | 271 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 210 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 50 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 33 | 4% |
Other | 94 | 12% |
Unknown | 306 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 168. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#246,158
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#36
of 2,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,418
of 407,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.