↓ Skip to main content

Unlocking neural complexity with a robotic key

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unlocking neural complexity with a robotic key
Published in
Journal of Physiology, March 2016
DOI 10.1113/jp271444
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Stratton, Michael Hasselmo, Michael Milford

Abstract

Implementing neural systems on robots has successfully elucidated many principles of neural sensorimotor processing in animals. Despite some understanding of how the brain processes perceptual input and generates direct motor output, we only poorly understand what happens in between - the neural processes that turn sensory input into coherent behavioural output through time. Brains exhibit complex emergent properties that cannot be understood by studying neural components in isolation. Complex brains have evolved for comprehending and interacting with complex environments in the real world. Studies utilising neural controllers on robots in the real world can exploit real-world complexity (without having to model it) while simultaneously offering an entirely observable, fully controllable experimental model. Complex brains evolved in order to comprehend and interact with complex environments in the real world. Despite significant progress in our understanding of perceptual representations in the brain, our understanding of how the brain carries out higher level processing remains largely superficial. This disconnect is understandable, since the direct mapping of sensory inputs to perceptual states is readily observed, while mappings between (unknown) stages of processing and intermediate neural states is not. We argue that testing theories of higher level neural processing on robots in the real world offers a clear path forward, since: 1. The complexity of the neural robotic controllers can be staged as necessary, avoiding the almost intractable complexity apparent in even the simplest current living nervous systems; 2. Robotic controller states are fully observable, avoiding the enormous technical challenge of recording from complete intact brains; and 3. Unlike computational modelling, the real world can stand for itself when using robots, avoiding the computational intractability of simulating the world at an arbitrary level of detail. We suggest that embracing the complex and often unpredictable closed-loop interactions between robotic neuro-controllers and the physical world will bring about deeper understanding of the role of complex brain function in the high-level processing of information and the control of behaviour. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
South Africa 1 4%
Unknown 21 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Researcher 4 16%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 28%
Engineering 4 16%
Neuroscience 4 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,778,071
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiology
#3,574
of 9,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,428
of 314,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiology
#33
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.