| Title |
Effects of oral contraceptives and natural menstrual cycling on environmental learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Women's Health, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12905-018-0671-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Filippo Bianchini, Paola Verde, Stefano Colangeli, Maddalena Boccia, Felice Strollo, Cecilia Guariglia, Giuseppe Bizzarro, Laura Piccardi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 8 | 29% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 96% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,440,088
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#132
of 2,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,709
of 366,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#5
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.