↓ Skip to main content

Intra-Abdominal and Abdominal Wall Desmoid Fibromatosis

Overview of attention for article published in Oncology and Therapy, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 189)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Intra-Abdominal and Abdominal Wall Desmoid Fibromatosis
Published in
Oncology and Therapy, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40487-016-0017-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Harrison Howard, Raphael E. Pollock

Abstract

Desmoid fibromatosis is a rare but locally aggressive tumor comprised of myofibroblasts. Desmoids do not have the ability to metastasize but can cause significant morbidity and mortality by local invasion. These tumors may occur throughout the body, but are commonly found on the abdominal wall and within the intestinal mesentery. Desmoids in these areas may cause unique clinical problems for physicians and patients. Mutations in either the β-catenin or the APC genes are usually the cause for the development of these tumors with the former comprising the sporadic development of tumors and the latter being associated with familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. Surgical resection with histologically negative margins has been the cornerstone of therapy for this disease, but this paradigm has begun to shift. It is now common to accept a microscopically positive margin after resection as recurrence rates may not be significantly affected. An even more radical evolution in management has been the recent movement towards "watchful waiting" when new desmoids are diagnosed. As the natural history of desmoids has become better understood, it is evident that some tumors will not grow and may even spontaneously regress sparing patients the morbidity of more aggressive therapy. Other modalities of treatment for desmoids include radiation and systemic therapy which both can be used adjuvantly or as definitive therapy and have shown durable response rates as single therapy regimens. The decision to use radiation and/or systemic therapies is often based on tumor biology, tumor location, surgical morbidity, and patient preference. Systemic therapy options have increased to include hormonal therapies, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and chemotherapy, as well as targeted therapies. Unfortunately, the rarity of this disease has resulted in a scarcity of randomized trials to evaluate any of these therapies emphasizing the need for this disease to be treated at high volume multidisciplinary institutions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 15%
Other 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,669,207
of 24,263,143 outputs
Outputs from Oncology and Therapy
#45
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,157
of 405,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncology and Therapy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,263,143 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.