↓ Skip to main content

The four-eyed dog in ancient Iran

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan, January 1969
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The four-eyed dog in ancient Iran
Published in
Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan, January 1969
DOI 10.5356/jorient.12.3-4_1
Authors

Eiichi Imoto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#16,555,016
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,505
of 14,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.