↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00134-018-5437-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Perrine Janiaud, Ioana-Alina Cristea, John P. A. Ioannidis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#20,540,789
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,744
of 5,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,009
of 352,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#116
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.