↓ Skip to main content

Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies for HIV Eradication

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 435)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies for HIV Eradication
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11904-016-0299-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn E. Stephenson, Dan H. Barouch

Abstract

Passive transfer of antibodies has long been considered a potential treatment modality for infectious diseases, including HIV. Early efforts to use antibodies to suppress HIV replication, however, were largely unsuccessful, as the antibodies that were studied neutralized only a relatively narrow spectrum of viral strains and were not very potent. Recent advances have led to the discovery of a large portfolio of human monoclonal antibodies that are broadly neutralizing across many HIV-1 subtypes and are also substantially more potent. These antibodies target multiple different epitopes on the HIV envelope, thus allowing for the development of antibody combinations. In this review, we discuss the application of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) for HIV treatment and HIV eradication strategies. We highlight bNAbs that target key epitopes, such as the CD4 binding site and the V2/V3-glycan-dependent sites, and we discuss several bNAbs that are currently in the clinical development pipeline.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 13%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,728,480
of 23,592,647 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#30
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,112
of 400,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,592,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them