| Title |
Value-cognitive boosting with a support vector machine for cross-project defect prediction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Empirical Software Engineering, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10664-014-9346-4 |
| Authors |
Duksan Ryu, Okjoo Choi, Jongmoon Baik |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 56 | 59% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 29 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,303,950
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#624
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,637
of 331,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.